| Prime commercial land is limited. Prices per square | | | | permitted on your 20,000 square foot parcel is |
| foot can be astronomical. Demand for efficiency to | | | | 240,000 square feet. You are utilizing only 38,000 |
| maximize return is growing. No wonder developers | | | | square feet which means, from a zoning standpoint |
| and property owners are looking to the sky, with | | | | at least, you are underutilizing your parcel to the |
| varying degrees of success, to capture all the value | | | | extent of 202,000 square feet. |
| they can from each urban parcel. | | | | Suppose you were able to reconfigure your |
| Owners and developers, and people in general, are | | | | proposed project to free up 1000 to 1200 square |
| conditioned to think of potential development sites as | | | | feet per floor in return for recovering half (or more) |
| flat surfaces with essentially two dimensions: north | | | | of your total land cost. If this were possible, your |
| south and east/west. They see only the surface of | | | | restaurant/banquet/entertainment complex may be |
| the land, and envision the building they will construct | | | | reduced in size to 36,000 square feet instead of |
| for the particular purpose they have in mind; a bank, | | | | 38,000 square feet, but your development cost for |
| a drugstore, a restaurant, a strip mall, a parking | | | | the project would be reduced $2,000,000 or more. |
| garage, an office building. If the parcel is larger than | | | | Almost free money. |
| they need, they may envision subdividing the parcel | | | | How could this work? |
| to make two or more lots. In most cases, however, | | | | Scenario No. 1: With the hypothetical facts presented, |
| they think primarily in terms of land coverage for the | | | | it is certainly within the realm of possibilities to |
| type of building they need. They visualize only the | | | | market and sell the "air space" above your proposed |
| two dimensional space depicted on their Site Plan or | | | | restaurant/banquet/entertainment complex for |
| Plat of Survey. | | | | development of offices and/or condominiums. As |
| In 30 out of 50 states, including all Mid-Western | | | | mentioned, under the applicable zoning classification, |
| states, the "Rectangular Survey System" is in effect. | | | | 202,000 square feet remains available for |
| The Rectangular Survey System was adopted in | | | | development on your site. With prevailing land values |
| 1785 to meet the needs of the Federal Government | | | | of $225 per square foot (represented by your |
| as it faced the challenge of dividing vast areas of | | | | purchase price of $4,500,000 for a 20,000 square |
| undeveloped land lying west of the original 13 | | | | foot parcel), a condominium/office developer may |
| colonies. The system, developed under the direction | | | | well view your "air space parcel" as a bargain at |
| of Thomas Jefferson, essentially divides the United | | | | $2,000,000 ($100 per square foot - measured in two |
| States into rectangles, measured in relation to lines | | | | dimensions for 20,000 square feet) since it would still |
| known as Meridians and Base Lines . | | | | enable construction of 202,000 square feet of floor |
| Development lots are instinctively viewed as the | | | | area above the second floor. |
| two-dimensional surface of land visually representing | | | | Obviously, to make the "air space" usable, adequate |
| a potential development parcel. Descriptions of a | | | | means of access and support must be planned, which |
| parcel typically refer to "a parcel of land X feet by Y | | | | will require detailed planning for design and |
| feet" located in relation to an intersection or other | | | | construction of both the ground level parcel and the |
| identifiable landmark. | | | | "air space" parcel (which do not necessarily need to |
| Once a parcel is "developed", or designated for | | | | be constructed at the same time, although |
| development, by construction of improvements on | | | | simultaneous construction may be more efficient and |
| the land, it is natural to think of the parcel as being | | | | practical) and creation of legally sufficient easements |
| unavailable for further development (unless the | | | | of support, and easements for ingress and egress, |
| existing improvements are to be demolished). | | | | utilities, loading and unloading, mail delivery, a street |
| Classic examples of this are single story commercial | | | | level lobby, elevators, standpipes, etc., as well as |
| buildings at prime commercial locations, a multi-deck | | | | drafting of development specific covenants running |
| parking garage or mid-rise building in a downtown | | | | with the land to promote non-interference and |
| development area, railroad tracks or spurs cutting | | | | compatibility of use of each parcel. The necessity for |
| across valuable urban land and, in some cases, | | | | easements of support, and easements (or |
| roadways and alleys. | | | | conveyance of fee parcels) for a street level lobby, |
| Each of these situations represent, potentially, | | | | mail delivery areas, and loading and unloading areas, is |
| underutilization of valuable real estate. Finding a way | | | | the reason slight reduction in size of the proposed |
| to develop the "air" above these existing or planned | | | | restaurant/banquet/entertainment complex is |
| improvements maximizes the economic utility of | | | | suggested in the premise to Scenario No. 1 - to free |
| these parcels and can be like creating "money from | | | | up space for these purposes. |
| thin air." | | | | While sale of an "air rights parcel" will require added |
| The practice of finding ways to utilize the "space | | | | expense for engineering (much of which will likely be |
| above" is often referred to as "air rights | | | | undertaken by the proposed developer of the air |
| development". Air rights development requires | | | | rights parcel) and attorneys fees to negotiate and |
| thinking in three dimensions, and requires serious | | | | draft a workable declaration of easements, |
| design consideration and legal planning but, when land | | | | covenants and restrictions to legally facilitate the |
| values are at a premium and zoning permits, the | | | | development and use of each parcel, the economic |
| economic return may be dramatic. | | | | advantage of being able to sell the air rights parcel |
| Though often overlooked, virtually all of Chicago's | | | | may more than justify the added effort and |
| downtown business district is a "city in the air". | | | | development expense involved. |
| People tend to think of streets and street level | | | | Scenario No. 2. Assume the same hypothetical facts |
| entrances to buildings in the downtown Chicago | | | | as in Scenario No. 1, except that instead of being the |
| "loop" as being at "ground level". This is simply not | | | | owner of the parcel referred to in Scenario No. 1 (the |
| the case. Most of what is thought of in the Chicago | | | | "Entertainment Parcel"), you own or wish to develop |
| Loop as being at "ground level" is located 12 to 22 | | | | a parcel adjacent to the Entertainment Parcel. |
| feet above the earth's surface. This explains the vast | | | | Perhaps the Entertainment Parcel has already been |
| network of "lower" streets and passageways in | | | | developed with the restaurant/banquet |
| downtown Chicago, such as "Lower Wacker Drive", | | | | entertainment complex referred to in Scenario No. 1. |
| "Lower Dearborn Street", "Lower State Street", etc. | | | | Assume your parcel (the "High Rise Parcel") is 40,000 |
| which most people seldom traverse. It also explains | | | | square feet with B6-6 zoning, and you wish to |
| why, in 1992, the Chicago Loop business district was | | | | construct (or to sell your parcel to a developer to |
| virtually shut down by "the Great Loop Flood of '92", | | | | construct) a mixed-use development with first floor |
| but few people got wet or even saw any water as | | | | retail, five floors of office space and six floors of |
| office and retail buildings were closed and workers | | | | luxury condominiums. Because zoning for the High |
| were sent home because of "flooding". | | | | Rise Parcel allows an F.A.R. of 12, you determine a |
| The point of these observations is to reveal that | | | | twelve-story, 480,000 square foot building is the |
| "development of air rights" is not new. Development | | | | maximum you will be able to construct on your |
| of so-called "air rights" is little more than efficient use | | | | 40,000 square foot lot |
| of a limited resource when use becomes economically | | | | In conducting a financial analysis of your project you |
| feasible and beneficial. | | | | determine that the marginal cost of each floor would |
| "Air rights" are part of the "bundle of rights" | | | | result in you generating a substantially greater return |
| constituting fee simple title to real estate. The term | | | | on your investment if you were able to construct |
| "air rights" generally refers to the right of the owner | | | | additional floors of office space, condominiums or |
| of fee simple title of a parcel of land to use the | | | | even multi-level parking in your proposed project on |
| space above the land. If this right did not exist, it | | | | the High Rise Parcel. Still, you are faced with the |
| would not be possible to construct improvements on | | | | maximum F.A.R. of 12 for the High Rise Parcel as |
| the land, such as a home, fence or other structure | | | | established by the hypothetical Zoning Ordinance. |
| above the surface of the land. While the ancient | | | | Is there a solution? Perhaps. |
| common law doctrine that "ownership of land | | | | Once again, using the Chicago Zoning Ordinance as an |
| extends to the periphery of the universe" has been | | | | example, a "Zoning Lot" is defined as follows: "A |
| limited to accommodate the modern world realities of | | | | 'zoning lot or lots' is a single tract of land located |
| air-travel, the fundamental concept that land | | | | within a single block, which (at the time of filing for a |
| ownership includes the right to use and occupy the | | | | building permit) is designated by its owner or |
| airspace above the surface of the land is well | | | | developer as a tract to be used, developed, or built |
| established. | | | | upon as a unit, under single ownership or control. |
| As one of the bundle of property rights comprising | | | | Therefore, 'zoning lot or lots' may or may not |
| fee simple title to real estate, "air rights" may also be | | | | coincide with a lot of record". |
| "unbundled" and alienated separate from other rights | | | | One solution is that the owner of the High Rise Parcel |
| in the bundle. Conceptually, from a legal standpoint, | | | | might acquire the "air rights" over the Entertainment |
| the separation and transfer of so-called "air rights" is | | | | Parcel (by purchasing from the owner of the |
| not materially different from subdividing and | | | | Entertainment Parcel, ". . . all of the Entertainment |
| transferring a lot pictured in only two dimensions. | | | | Parcel except that part thereof lying below a |
| Instead of subdividing and selling off, for example, | | | | horizontal plane located x feet above the Chicago |
| "that part of Lot 1 lying east of the west 100 feet | | | | City Datum" or other established benchmark) and |
| of Lot 1" as depicted on a plat of survey, the | | | | then designate the Entertainment Parcel as part of |
| transfer of air rights subdivides and transfers a parcel | | | | the Zoning Lot to be developed and controlled by |
| based upon its vertical elevation. For example, one | | | | the developer of the High Rise Parcel. The "Zoning |
| might subdivide and transfer "that part of Lot 1 lying | | | | Lot" would then be 60,000 square feet . Because the |
| above a horizontal plane located 100 feet above | | | | F.A.R. remains 12, the maximum floor area on the |
| [some benchmark elevation]. | | | | total Zoning Lot is 720,000 square feet. |
| By dividing a development parcel "vertically", it is | | | | Because 38,000 square feet has been used (or is to |
| often possible to "stack" uses in a mixed use | | | | be used) for the restaurant/banquet/entertainment |
| development owned by more than one owner or | | | | complex, 682,000 square feet remains available for |
| developer, in the same way it is possible to subdivide | | | | development on the Zoning Lot (being, in effect, the |
| and develop side-by-side a horizontal surface | | | | High Rise Parcel) . Therefore, instead of being able to |
| subdivision. In some cases, without even developing | | | | construct only a 480,000 square foot project on the |
| the open air above existing or planned improvements, | | | | High Rise Parcel, if developed alone, the developer |
| it is possible to sell and transfer "air rights" to an | | | | would now be able to construct up to an additional |
| adjacent property owner to allow construction of a | | | | 202,000 square feet (for a total of 682,000 square |
| taller building on an adjacent building site. Recognizing | | | | feet) on the High Rise Parcel - or, roughly, 5 additional |
| this potential can result in a substantial economic | | | | floors at 40,000 square feet each, because the High |
| windfall to a property owner otherwise underutilizing | | | | Rise Parcel and the Entertainment Parcel, collectively, |
| a valuable development parcel. | | | | constitute the "Zoning Lot". |
| Hypothetical Facts: Suppose you are planning to | | | | Of course, if the developer does construct 682,000 |
| acquire a 20,000 square foot parcel in a fairly typical | | | | square feet of floor area on the High Rise Parcel (in |
| commercial zoning district that permits a wide array | | | | addition to the 38,000 square feet constructed on |
| of permitted business and service uses including | | | | the Entertainment Parcel) under the foregoing |
| restaurants and banquet halls serving food and liquor | | | | Scenario No. 2, all floor area available for development |
| as well as dwelling units so long as the dwelling units | | | | of the combined Zoning Lot pursuant to the zoning |
| are not below the second floor. The zoning district | | | | ordinance will have been fully utilized. As a result, |
| permits a floor area ratio 12:1. Your purchase price is | | | | since the Zoning Lot is fully developed as a whole, no |
| $4,500,000. | | | | further opportunity exists to expand the square |
| You believe your prospective development parcel is a | | | | footage of improvements on the Entertainment |
| perfect location for a restaurant/banquet | | | | Parcel. If the restaurant/banquet/entertainment |
| entertainment complex serving food and liquor, with | | | | complex fails, or is destroyed or otherwise |
| live entertainment and dancing. You visualize a state | | | | demolished, the replacement improvements will be |
| of the art venue spread out over 2 floors, with | | | | limited to a maximum square footage of 38,000 |
| about 19,000 square feet of usable space per floor, | | | | square feet. |
| for a total restaurant/banquet/entertainment venue | | | | To avoid this outcome, parties will sometimes |
| of 38,000 square feet. Fortunately, adequate parking | | | | negotiate an "air rights transfer" that raises the |
| is close by and available. Demand for offices and | | | | elevation of the delimiting horizontal plane and includes |
| condominium housing is growing in the vicinity of your | | | | an express covenant running with the land that |
| parcel, which you believe will further enhance the | | | | reserves potential floor area to the transferring |
| chances of success of your planned business by | | | | parcel (in this case, the Entertainment Parcel). |
| bringing more customers through your doors. | | | | Under Scenario No. 2, the sale of "air rights" is more |
| Although you recognize development of offices and | | | | akin to the sale of "development rights", but the legal |
| condominiums in your area is a "hot" development | | | | principal is substantially the same as in Scenario No. 1. |
| opportunity and might also be an excellent | | | | In each case, a property owner is selling the right to |
| investment, you have no interest or experience in | | | | develop "the sky above" while retaining the ground |
| developing offices or condominiums and really just | | | | level development parcel. |
| want to develop and open your dream restaurant | | | | "Air rights" are valuable property rights that can be |
| banquet/entertainment complex. You have calculated | | | | sold, purchased and transferred. Under the right |
| your costs of construction and operation, and believe | | | | circumstances, "air rights" may represent a substantial |
| the project is economically feasible, although you | | | | untapped resource with great value to those who |
| would like to find a way to cut your costs or | | | | recognize their potential. Since the transfer of these |
| otherwise increase your return on investment. | | | | property rights may not directly impair the owner's |
| As stated above, the permitted floor area ratio | | | | intended use of the surface level property, they |
| (F.A.R.) for the parcel zoned is 12; which means that | | | | often do represent "money from thin air". |
| the total square footage of the building or buildings | | | | |